Emissions reduction fund poorly designed, misleads on emissions cuts: audit

DeMarco’s audit of the program released Thursday says the process the Department of Natural Resources used for calculating the emissions lacked transparency, and that the companies had to report if they retained jobs but that doing so wasn’t a requirement to receive the funding.

It also said the claimed emissions cuts were based on outdated data about existing emissions, and the program didn’t ensure that companies were using the money for new projects they wouldn’t have otherwise done.

Two-thirds of applicants for the 40 projects funded in the first round also stated outright that the funds were going to allow them to boost production. But neither they nor the federal government accounted for the increased emissions that would generate, and it’s possible, said DeMarco, the increased production would produce more emissions than the program is able to cut.

Conservative party critics said in a joint statement that “the funding may have actually led to an increase in carbon emissions is ridiculous.”

Julia Levin, a senior manager for climate and energy at Environmental Defence, said this is clearly an inefficient fossil fuel subsidy, something the government claims it is phasing out by the end of 2023.

“Ministers who are coherent with the promises they made just two weeks ago would cancel this program but I suspect they won’t do that,” she said.

Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson and Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault said they welcomed the audit, along with the others released by DeMarco’s office Thursday.

That includes a damning report looking at Canada’s overall progress on climate change.

DeMarco said Canada started promising to cut emissions three decades ago and since then emissions have gone up 20 per cent.

“Canada was once a leader in the fight against climate change,” DeMarco said. “However, after a series of missed opportunities, it has become the worst performer of all G7 nations since the landmark Paris Agreement on climate change was adopted in 2015. We can’t continue to go from failure to failure; we need action and results, not just more targets and plans.”

The ministers said the climate plans introduced since 2015 are starting to show results.

“We are confident that we’ve put in place the fundamentals, including with one of the world’s most stringent pollution pricing and rebate programs, to take Canada’s climate fight to the next level,” they said.

Wilkinson’s department was less welcoming of the findings of the emissions reduction fund audit, only agreeing in part with many of the recommendations, and not directly addressing some of the biggest concerns about double counting and overestimating emissions cuts.

DeMarco said that is disappointing.

“They didn’t indicate to me that the department was willing to fully acknowledge the degree of problems,” he said.

He said he knows the fund was “hastily” developed in the pandemic but said that’s not an excuse for shoddy work and there is still time to fix what ails it before more money goes out the door.

Two rounds of applications have been completed so far, with the deadline for a third round coming in January. All told the fund has paid out $134 million to 26 companies for 81 projects, which the government claims cut more than 4.6 million tonnes of emissions.

DeMarco only audited the first round of applications — 15 companies, 40 projects and $71.5 million. He said the program’s design is so flawed he can’t assess what emissions it actually did cut. He believes the government is vastly overestimating what this program can achieve.

The department itself admitted its emissions goals would require almost all 610 companies eligible for the fund to take part to the maximum benefit. In the first two of three rounds, only 26 companies applied.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 25, 2021.

Mia Rabson, The Canadian Press

by The Canadian Press

Emissions reduction fund poorly designed, misleads on emissions cuts: audit

What's Trending