New Brunswick judge rejects ‘rambling’ anti-vax arguments from four public servants

Last fall, the province made COVID-19 vaccinations mandatory for all government employees, saying those who failed to comply with the directive would be placed on indefinite unpaid leave.

In November 2021, two teachers and two health-care workers sued the province, claiming their constitutional rights had been violated.

In his decision, Christie called the workers’ legal arguments “rambling” and rejected the notion that they were being forced to do something against their will, as if they were being treated as slaves.

“The applicants claim that their bodily integrity is at stake, comparing themselves to victims of some of the most brutal crimes …. I join in the developing judicial view that, in the circumstances of a global pandemic, policies of the type presently at issue force no one to do anything.”

He cited two similar cases in Canada last year. In one, the judge stated that those involved were being forced to choose between getting vaccinated and keeping their jobs or remaining unvaccinated and losing their income. In the other, the judge said that what was at stake “was not forcible vaccination but rather the consequences of one’s choice to remain unvaccinated.”

In the New Brunswick case, Christie sided with the province, which had filed an application to have the lawsuit dismissed.

The New Brunswick Nurses Union and New Brunswick Teachers Federation acted as interveners in the case, saying they also wanted the case dismissed. The judge noted that the right to file a grievance rests with the union and not individual union members.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 10, 2022.

— By Michael MacDonald in Halifax

The Canadian Press

by The Canadian Press

New Brunswick judge rejects ‘rambling’ anti-vax arguments from four public servants

What's Trending